Criteria

Text:
Content:
Display:

Results

Viewing 91 to 120 of 668
HISTORICAL
2016-10-13
Standard
AIR5826A
This document provides a review of published methods that have been used to provide estimates of the levels of distortion and/or the concomitant loss of stability pressure ratio that can occur when the recommended full complement of aerodynamic interface plane high-response instrumentation is not used when obtaining inlet data. The methods have been categorized based on the underlying mathematical representation of the aerophysics. Further, the use of maximum value statistics, which has been used to further improve the results where short-duration time records have been employed, is discussed.
CURRENT
2016-10-13
Standard
J826/2_201610
This document describes the 2-D computer-aided design (CAD) template for the HPM-1 H-point machine or HPD available from SAE. The elements of the HPD include the curve shapes, datum points and lines, and calibration references. The intended purpose for this information is to provide a master CAD reference for design and benchmarking. The content and format of the data files that are available are also described. The actual CAD model files are included with this product and are provided in the following formats: CATIA v5 (without parametrics), IGES, and STEP.
2016-10-07
WIP Standard
ARP6909
This SAE XXX defines acceptable methods for determining the seat reference point (SRP), and the documentation requirements for that determination, for passenger and crew seats in Transport Aircraft, Civil Rotorcraft and General Aviation Aircraft.
CURRENT
2016-10-05
Standard
J744_201610
This SAE Standard applies to hydraulic pumps and motors used on off-road self-propelled work machines as described in SAE J1116.
CURRENT
2016-08-29
Standard
AIR1412C
This document lists those guidelines recognized as being essential for consideration by the designer who is preparing to select an elastomer as part of an aerospace design.
CURRENT
2016-08-04
Standard
J2869_201608
This report details continuing work examining the fatigue life durability of a US Army Trailer. This report describes, through example, a process to evaluate and reduce the experimental data needed for a Mechanical Systems Physics - of Failure analysis. In addition the report describes the process used to validate the computer simulation models.
CURRENT
2016-08-01
Standard
ARP4868C
The SAE Aerospace Standard document AS681 is the parent document of this SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP). AS681 applies to Engine programs written to conform to this document. This ARP specifies a set of functions and their expected behaviors that constitute a function based Application Program Interface (API) for gas turbine engine customer programs. The functions specified in this API are delivered by the Supplier as part of the Engine model. This document defines generic language independent functions and specific appendices for implementations in C and Fortran. The function based API specified in this ARP represents an alternative to the Fortran COMMON block structure, as specified in AS4191, historically used to communicate with an engine program. The customer may request emulation of the AS4191 interface if desired.
CURRENT
2016-07-14
Standard
J3079/2_201607
This SAE Standard specifies a method for measuring the deflection of friction materials, noise insulators, and disc brake pad assemblies to be used in road vehicles with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating below 4336 kg. This part of the SAE J3079 includes the test for deflection and creep at various pressures under ambient temperature conditions. This SAE test method differs from SAE J2468 and ISO 6310 in the preload and maximum load applied to the test sample when deflection is measured. It also introduces additional measurements such as for deflection offset, hysteresis, and creep.
CURRENT
2016-07-12
Standard
J2365_201607
This Recommended Practice can apply to both Original Equipment Manufacturer and Aftermarket route-guidance and navigation system functions for passenger vehicles. The methods apply only to the presentation of visual information and the use of manual control inputs to accomplish a navigation or route guidance task. They do not apply to visual monitoring tasks which do not require a manual control input, such as route following. Voice-activated controls or passenger operation of controls are also excluded.
CURRENT
2016-06-28
Standard
J2830_201606
This recommended practice describes a process for testing the comprehension of static (i.e., fixed or non-dynamic) symbols for all ground vehicles, for both OEM and aftermarket products. With advancing display technology, it is now possible to display dynamic symbols (e.g., a spinning beach ball to show that a process is ongoing, or a diagram showing energy distribution in hybrid vehicles). Such graphics are outside of the scope of this recommended practice, though extensions of this process may be useful for testing them. However, several symbols which occupy the same space on a display may change state without movement (e.g. play/pause button); these are within the scope of this recommended practice. The process described in this recommended practice includes criteria that are used to identify how well the perceived meaning matches the intended meaning for a representative sample of drivers.
CURRENT
2016-06-17
Standard
RB4A
A guide for the use by companies contracting for design of electronic products with the Department of Defense (DOD) and other government agencies. This Bulletin present concepts and techniques for quantifying electronic equipment reliability. The techniques are responsive to the requirements of various branches of the Department of Defense and are also useful with regard to other Government agencies (e.g., NASA).
CURRENT
2016-06-17
Standard
RB9
This Reliability Bulletin is provided as a guide for engineering and managment personnel concerned with Failure Mode and Effect Analyses (FMEA). In Addition, it provides information concerning technical and functional relationship of Failure Mode and Effect Analyses to associated disciplines, as for example, Maintainability, Safety, and System Effectiveness Analyses. This Bulletin covers requirements, concepts, interface, procedures and reports of FMEA. This Bulletin should contribute to greater utilization of FMEA results and to the understanding and appreciation of the purpose of FMEA on the part of engineering and management personnel.
CURRENT
2016-06-16
Standard
EIAEDIF1
The increase in the number of silicon foundries and CAD/CAE system and workstation companies, and the problem of movement of data among in-house design systems has made a standard interchange format for electronic design data essential. The benefits of the general adoption of a standard interchange format are important and far reaching. The customer receives a much wider variety of feasible choices, and free competition in both CAEYCAD system/tool businesses and foundry businesses is enhanced. The electronic circuit designer and customer of CAE/CAD system and foundry service can expect compatibility among these products. The designer can choose equipment and services best suited for a particular task with a minimum of overhead. Foundries can work with customers regardless of the CAE/CAD equipment that the customer is using.
CURRENT
2016-06-16
Standard
EIAEDIF2
This volume is the second in a series of monographs which will make the standard (ANSUEIA 548-1988) easier to understand. It is intended to be used as a companion to the EDIF Reference Manual Version 2.0.0, which is also published by the EL4 (ISBN 0-7908-0000-4). This volume gives an introduction to the concept of connectivity in the format. Concepts are explained in a general way; constructs, such as net, appear in italics throughout this volume. Whenever more detail is desired about a topic the italicized constructs should be consulted in the EDIF Reference Manual. The EDIF Reference Manual contains the official definition of the format and should always be taken as the authoritative source of information. Further application guides will be provided in later volumes of this series.
CURRENT
2016-06-16
Standard
EIAEDIFAG1
This document offers some conventions for the use of EDIF in transfer applications involving schematic designs. It discusses the use of EDIF 2 0 0 constructs that apply to the SCHEMATIC view. This document does not attempt to cover the use of EDIF for the transfer of all design aspects, It is intended to be a starting point for implementing EDIF schematic translators. It is not an EDIF user manual. It is not an amendment to the EDIF 2 O O Recommended Standard ANSIIEIA-548, which contains the official definition of the format and should always be taken as the authoritative source of EDIF information. This document assumes you are familiar with schematic capture systems but not familiar with EDIF. You will need to refer to EIA-548 for detailed definitions of some of the constructs discussed below.
CURRENT
2016-06-16
Standard
EIAIS632
This standard defines a total system approach for the development of systems. The standard requires: establishing and implementing a structured, disciplined. and documented systems engineering effort incorporating the systems engineering process; multidisciplinary teamwork; and the simultaneous development of the products and processes needed to satisfy user needs. The systems engineering process is defined generically to facilitate broad application. This standard defines the requirements for technical reviews. The tasks in this standard provide a methodology for evaluating progress in achieving system objectives. This standard provides a comprehensive, structured, and disciplined approach for all life-cycle phases, including new system product and process developments, upgrades, modifications, and engineering efforts conducted to resolve problems in fielded systems.
CURRENT
2016-06-16
Standard
EIAIS731_1
The purposeo f this Interim Standard is to support the development and improvement of systems engineering capability. The scope of this standard includesa ll activities that associate with or enable systems engineering. Systems engineering is an inter-disciplinary approach and means to enable the realization of successful systems. In this context, systems engineering is not limited to what either Systems Engineering organizations or Systems Engineers do. Rather it is the interaction of many people, processes, and organizations resulting in the accomplishment of the required activities.
CURRENT
2016-06-16
Standard
EIAIS731_2
This document describes the Appraisal Method (AM ) for the Systems Engineering Capability Model (SECM). An appraisal compares an organization's Systems Engineering capabilities against the Specific Practices of the Focus Areas and the Generic Characteristics defined in EIA/731, Part 1.
CURRENT
2016-06-16
Standard
EQB1
Scope is unavailable.
CURRENT
2016-06-16
Standard
EQB3
The Electronic Industries Association (EIA) G-47 Effectiveness QuantificationCommittee has a basic task to quantify system effectiveness. Since the support parameters underly any prime parameter quantification, the topic of support system analysis is a fundamental one to this basic committee task. The charts contained in this bulletin were developed and used for presentations to aircraft support engineering groups, to comunicate the logic and scope of system analysis applied to support system optimization.
CURRENT
2016-06-16
Standard
EQB2
Program Managers have considered the subject of effectiveness quantification from three diverse points of view. The first viewpoint, in conjunction with the system effectiveness analyst, is to quantify everything and to consider everything quantifiable into a figure of merit. The result is a numerical decision aid that usually has some undesirable attributes such as oversimplification, non-sensitivity to critical parameters, hidden calculations, and difficulty in exercise of the model. This technique is characterized by mathematical models, computer programs, and attempted optimizations. The second viewpoint, in conjunction with the controller, is to consider the effectiveness as specified and concentrate on cost reduction, This has a danger of formulating all technical problems in terms of cost or economic considerations. This technique is characterized by closely controlled work packages.
CURRENT
2016-06-16
Standard
EQB4
This report on quantification of Essentiality (W) and Utilization (U) terms extends the scope of the basic expression for system effectiveness (Es = ADC) to include the additional "W" and "U" paramenters needed for the quantification of multi-functioned and multi-missioned systems. Methods and procedures for applying these terms to system effectiveness quantification are discussed and simple examples to demonstrate the principles of usage are included. The need to look at the system being quantified in terms of its level in the mission/function hierarchical tree is explained. The relationships between system elements (hardware, software, and personnel) and performance functions are discussed and illustrated with examples. Two methods for applying the "W"'and "U" weight factors, LOGIC AND (weak link model) and LOGIC OR (degraded operational modes model) are described and examples are shown for these cases.
CURRENT
2016-06-15
Standard
EIAIS106
This standard will assist the vendors and users of CASE tools in developing mechanisms for interchanging information between CASE tools. This standard specifies an element of a family of related standards. When used together, these standards specify a mechanism for transfemng information between CASE tools. This standard, EIAIIS-IO6 CDIF - CASE Data Interchange Format - Overview, describes the architecture of the CDIF Family of Standards and provides an overview to all the current standards that form the CDIF Family of Standards.
CURRENT
2016-06-15
Standard
EIAIS108
This standard defines how CDIF supports multiple exchange Syntaxes and Encoding, and describes how CDIF meta-models are concretely represented during a transfer. EIAIZS-IO9 CDIF - Trartsfer- Format - Syntax SYNTAX.1 and EIAIIS-II0 CDIF - Transfer Format - Encoding ENCODING.1 define one specific CDIF Syntax and Encoding.
CURRENT
2016-06-15
Standard
EIAIS110
This document is intended to be used by anyone wishing to understand and/or use CDIF. This dticument provides a definition of an encoding for CDIF transfers. -those evaluating CDIF -those who wish to understand the principles and concepts of a CDIF transfer -those developing importers and exporters.
CURRENT
2016-06-15
Standard
EIAIS107
This standard will assist the vendors and users of CASE tools in developing mechanisms for interchanging information between CASE tools. This standard specifies an element of a family of related standards. When used together, these standards specify a mechanism for transferring information between CASE tools.
CURRENT
2016-06-15
Standard
EIAIS109
The CDIF Family of Standards is primarily designed to be used as a description of a mechanism for transferring information between CASE tools. It facilitates a successful transfer when the authors of the importing and exporting tools have nothing in common except an agreement to conform to CDIF. The language that is defined for the Transfer Format also has applicability as a general language for ImportExport from repositories. The CDIF Integrated Meta-model defined for CASE also has applicability as the basis of standard definitions for use in repositories.
CURRENT
2016-06-15
Standard
EIAIS111
This document is intended to be used by anyone wishing to understand and/or use CDIF. This document provides a definition of a single subject area of the CDIF integrated Meta-model. It is suitable for: -those evaluating CDIF -those who wish to understand the principles and concepts of a CDIF transfer -those developing importers and exporters.
2016-06-07
WIP Standard
AIR6908
This document provides informational background, rationale, and data (both physical testing and computer simulations) used in defining the component test methods and acceptance criteria described in SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) 6330. ARP 6330 defines multiple test methods uses to assess the effect of seat back mounted IFE monitor changes on head blunt trauma.
CURRENT
2016-06-06
Standard
AS681K
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) provides the method for presentation of gas turbine engine steady-state and transient performance calculated using computer programs. It also provides for the presentation of parametric gas turbine data including performance, weight, and dimensions computed by computer programs. This standard is intended to facilitate calculations by the program user without unduly restricting the method of calculation used by the program supplier. This standard is applicable to, but not limited to the following program types: data reduction, steady-state, transient, preliminary design, study, specification, status, and parametric programs.
Viewing 91 to 120 of 668