Display:

Results

Viewing 1 to 30 of 2197
2016-10-17
Technical Paper
2016-01-2328
Edward Chappell, Richard Burke, Pin Lu, Michael Gee, Rod Williams
The discrepancies between certification and on-road vehicle performance is becoming increasingly important as emissions and fuel consumption estimates are proving inaccurate predictors of in-service behaviour. The objective of this paper is to identify and analyse these differences and the work forms the first phase of a project aiming to create new, highly repeatable test methods to measure very small differences in powertrain performance whilst being representative of real world conditions. These new methodologies will be developed on an advanced chassis dynamometer facility and facilitate the development of future fuel technologies focussed on delivering real world benefits. The engine controller of a 2.0L Diesel vehicle with active de-NOx and particular filter (DPF) has been monitored over WLTC and NEDC cycles and 12000km of on-road driving. Different filtering and data representation methods are compared to aid in the analysis and understanding of on-road data.
2016-09-27
Journal Article
2016-01-8017
Eric Wood, Adam Duran, Kenneth Kelly
In collaboration with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory has conducted a national analysis of road grade characteristics experienced by U.S. medium- and heavy-duty trucks on controlled access highways. These characteristics have been developed using TomTom’s commercially available street map and road grade database. Using the TomTom national road grade database, national statistics on road grade and hill distances were generated for the U.S. network of controlled access highways. These statistical distributions were then weighted using data provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on activity of medium- and heavy-duty trucks on controlled access highways. The national activity-weighted road grade and hill distance distributions were then used as targets for development of a handful of sample grade profiles potentially to be used in the U.S.
2016-09-27
Journal Article
2016-01-8018
Houshun Zhang, L. James Sanchez, Matthew Spears, Jayant Sarlashkar, Dennis Robertson, Michael Ross
In June of 2015 the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued a Notice of Proposal Rulemaking to further reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve the fuel efficiency of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. The agencies proposed that vehicle manufacturers would certify vehicles to the standards by using the agencies’ Greenhouse Gas Emission Model (GEM). The agencies also proposed a steady-state engine test procedure for generating GEM inputs to represent the vehicle’s engine performance. In the proposal the agencies also requested comment on an alternative engine test procedure, the details of which were published in two separate 2015 SAE Technical Papers1,2. As an alternative to the proposed steady-state engine test procedure, these papers presented a cycle-average test procedure. The papers also explored how a range of vehicle configurations could be defined and selected for generating the engine duty cycles for this test procedure.
2016-09-20
Technical Paper
2016-01-2005
Jia Zeng, Zhenjie Shu, Shan Zhu
Interest in civil unmanned aircraft system (UAS) is growing worldwide, as it has the potential to create new applications and markets in civil domains. As the related technologies, including micro-electronics, composite structure, autonomous control, green energy, has been seen a rapid development, various types of UAS are constantly emerging following the expansion of functions and applications. Thus, there is a need for classified management supervision and certification for UAS. Considering the lacking of standardization for UAV category and classification, it is extremely urgent to raise a proper standard to classify and categorize UAS.
2016-09-20
Technical Paper
2016-01-2044
Jeffrey J. Joyce, Scott Beecher, Laurent Fabre, Ramesh Rajagopalan
Over the past few decades, advanced methods have been developed for the analysis of digital systems using mathematical reasoning, i.e., formal logic. These methods are supported by sophisticated software tools that can be used to perform analysis far beyond what is practically achievable using “paper and pencil” analysis. In 2011, RTCA published RTCA DO 178C along with a set of supplements including RTCA DO 333 which provides guidance on the use of formal methods towards the certification of airborne software. Such methods have the potential to reduce the cost of verification by using formal analysis instead of conventional test-based methods to produce a portion of the verification evidence required for certification. Formal methods can also be used to find problems earlier in the development process – for example, while the requirements are being developed rather than during system integration when the cost of re-working the requirements and design is much higher.
2016-09-20
Technical Paper
2016-01-2039
Prashant S. Vadgaonkar, Ullas Janardhan
Avionics industry is moving towards fly-by wire aircrafts with less reliance on mechanical systems leading to increase in the complexity of in-flight hardware elements. RTCA/DO-254 and EUROCAE ED-80 plays a vital role in the design assurance of airborne electronic hardware. RTCA/ DO-254 and EUROCAE ED-80 are the industry standards for Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware. The two different agencies FAA and EU regulate and apply this design assurance guidance to the regulatory law in CFR and EASA CS respectively. This paper discusses the need for DO-254 /ED-80 certification in Aerospace industry, the advantages and benefits to the avionics manufacturers. The paper presents the study made on similarities and differences between DO-254/ED-80.
2016-09-18
Journal Article
2016-01-1925
David B. Antanaitis
Abstract The strong focus on reducing brake drag, driven by a historic ramp-up in global fuel economy and carbon emissions standards, has led to renewed research on brake caliper drag behaviors and how to measure them. However, with the increased knowledge of the range of drag behaviors that a caliper can exhibit comes a particularly vexing problem - how should this complex range of behaviors be represented in the overall road load of the vehicle? What conditions are encountered during coastdown and fuel economy testing, and how should brake drag be measured and represented in these conditions? With the Environmental Protection Agency (amongst other regulating agencies around the world) conducting audit testing, and the requirement that published road load values be repeatable within a specified range during these audits, the importance of answering these questions accurately is elevated. This paper studies these questions, and even offers methodology for addressing them.
2016-08-16
WIP Standard
AS4211E
Remove AS85421 performance specification and leave AS85720 performance specification to provide clarification regarding the QPL and associated pressure applications.
2016-08-16
WIP Standard
AS4220D
Remove AS85421 performance specification and leave AS85720 performance specification to provide clarification regarding the QPL and associated pressure applications.
2016-08-16
WIP Standard
AS4210E
Remove AS85421 performance specification and leave AS85720 performance specification to provide clarification regarding the QPL and associated pressure applications.
2016-08-16
WIP Standard
AS4224D
Remove AS85421 performance specification and leave AS85720 performance specification to provide clarification regarding the QPL and associated pressure applications.
2016-08-16
WIP Standard
AS4807D
Remove AS85421 performance specification and leave AS85720 performance specification to provide clarification regarding the QPL and associated pressure applications. Correct the “V” dimension for size 10.
2016-08-16
WIP Standard
AS4221D
Remove AS85421 performance specification and leave AS85720 performance specification to provide clarification regarding the QPL and associated pressure applications.
2016-08-16
WIP Standard
AS5002D
Remove AS85421 performance specification and leave AS85720 performance specification to provide clarification regarding the QPL and associated pressure applications..
2016-08-16
WIP Standard
AS5003D
Remove AS85421 performance specification and leave AS85720 performance specification to provide clarification regarding the QPL and associated pressure applications.
2016-08-16
WIP Standard
AS4809D
Remove AS85421 performance specification and leave AS85720 performance specification to provide clarification regarding the QPL and associated pressure applications.
2016-08-16
WIP Standard
AS5004D
Remove AS85421 performance specification and leave AS85720 performance specification to provide clarification regarding the QPL and associated pressure applications.
2016-06-17
Standard
EIA599A
This Standard is applicable to suppliers of electronic components, assemblies, equipment and related materials. This standard establishes the general requirements to achieve a certified process. The use of this standard is intended for any manufacturing or service company whose goal is to achieve customer satisfaction through continuous improvement.
2016-05-17
WIP Standard
JA6268
This Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) was created to help industry deal with existing barriers to the successful implementation of Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) technology in the aerospace and automotive sectors. That is,given the common barriers that exist, this ARP can be applied not only to aerospace but also to the automotive, commercial and military vehicle sectors. Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) in all of these sectors are heavily dependant upon a large number of component suppliers in order to design and build their products. The advent of IVHM technology has accentuated the need for improved coordination and communication between the OEM and its suppliers –to ensure that suppliers design health ready capabilities into their particular components.
2016-05-17
WIP Standard
AIR6245
This document is applicable to military aircraft where stakeholders are seeking guidance on the development and approval of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) technologies and on the integration of these technologies into encompassing maintenance and operational support systems. The document will refer to those guidelines prepared under SAE ARP6461 that are relevant and applicable to military applications.
2016-05-04
WIP Standard
AIR5120A
This document has been declared "CANCELLED" by the E32 committee as of April 2016 and has been superseded by ARP5120. By this action, this document will remain listed in the Numerical Section of the Aerospace Standards Index noting that it is superseded by ARP5120. Cancelled specifications are available from SAE.
2016-04-22
WIP Standard
ARP6904
In order to realize the benefits of Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) within the aerospace and defense industry there is a need to address five critical elements of data interoperability within and across the aircraft maintenance ecosystem, namely • Approach • Trust • Context • Value • Security In Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM) data interoperability is the ability of different authorized components, systems, IT, software, applications and organizations to securely communicate, exchange data, interpret data, use the information and derive consistent insight from the data that has been exchanged to derive value.
2016-04-21
WIP Standard
AS1043G
No scope available.
2016-04-20
Standard
AS9133A
This standard defines a system for the qualification of standard products for aviation, space, and defense applications. It defines the principles that shall be adhered to when carrying out product qualification; applied in conjunction with the rules and procedures of the CA. The system enables the CA to confirm compliance is achieved and maintained, in accordance with the requirements of its product definition and associated controlling technical specifications by an Original Component Manufacturer (OCM) of standard products. This standard requires an OCM that has been granted product qualification approval to ensure applicable approvals are maintained and renewed in accordance with the CA’s quality system for that qualified product. OCMs and OCM designated Value Added Distributors (VADs) requesting product qualification to this standard, shall as a prerequisite, maintain 9100 standard quality management system certification approval.
Viewing 1 to 30 of 2197

Filter